Your TMPDesignerReview time depends on the RCA, road environment, complexity, completeness of the submission and urgency. Contractors should avoid promising start dates until the relevant authority has completed its review.
The key points, split into simple blocks so the page is useful without feeling like a wall of text.
Review time depends on the RCA, road type, completeness of the submission, work complexity, public transport impacts, state highway interfaces and whether comments need a response. Simple, complete submissions on local roads are usually faster than complex or incomplete ones.
Work backwards from the desired start date and allow time for design, internal checking, RCA review, comments, amendments and contractor mobilisation. Starting the TMP conversation on the day work is planned is a common cause of delay.
Urgency does not remove the need for clear information. A complete brief is the fastest useful starting point when time is tight. Authority review pathways still apply, so urgent jobs need accurate, well-organised submissions.
The relevant council, RCA or network owner reviews the submission. Our role is to help make the information clearer, more complete and easier to respond to.
Send the work location, scope, dates, site plans or markups, methodology, hours of work, access needs, photos if available, and any RCA comments already received.
Yes. Your TMP Designer focuses on the planning, documentation and drawing support around the job. If your project also needs on-road setup, equipment or training, we can keep the TMP, CAR/WAP and drawing information aligned while those field services are arranged with the right provider.
Send plans, photos, dates or RCA comments and get practical next steps for TMP design, CAR support, amendments or overflow planning.