Your TMPDesignerRFIs usually happen when the reviewer cannot see how the TMP matches the work, site, dates, pedestrian effects, access needs, methodology or risk controls.
The key points, split into simple blocks so the page is useful without feeling like a wall of text.
RFIs often focus on missing staging, unclear pedestrian management, dates that do not match, vague work methods, access impacts or drawings that do not reflect the actual site. Each theme points to a place where the reviewer cannot see the link between the work and the controls.
Respond directly to each comment, update the TMP/TMD where needed and keep version changes clear so the reviewer can see what has changed. A covering note that maps each response to the relevant document page helps reviewers move faster.
Keep a simple comment tracker and reuse lessons from previous submissions. Repeated issues usually point to a briefing or template problem. Fixing the briefing process often prevents the same RFI from appearing on the next job.
The relevant council, RCA or network owner reviews the submission. Our role is to help make the information clearer, more complete and easier to respond to.
Send the work location, scope, dates, site plans or markups, methodology, hours of work, access needs, photos if available, and any RCA comments already received.
Yes. Your TMP Designer focuses on the planning, documentation and drawing support around the job. If your project also needs on-road setup, equipment or training, we can keep the TMP, CAR/WAP and drawing information aligned while those field services are arranged with the right provider.
Send plans, photos, dates or RCA comments and get practical next steps for TMP design, CAR support, amendments or overflow planning.